Andrea Dick is a fervent Trump fan who believes the election was rigged against him, despite the fact that her claim has been thoroughly rejected. She’s not a fan of Joe Biden, to put it mildly.
Crudely Worded Messages Blaring From Banners
“Don’t Blame Me/I Voted for Trump” and other crudely worded messages blaring from banners outside her New Jersey home make it plain what she believes. However, the Supreme Court long ago ruled that the phrase’s usage could not be prohibited only to protect those it offends, therefore many people use it.
They asked her to remove many banners that they argued were in violation of an anti-obscenity ordinance, but she refused. Now, she’s refusing to comply with a court order and vowing to fight it in court on the basis of free speech.
In an interview on Monday, she said, “It’s my First Amendment right, and I’m going to stick with that.”
Read Also:
- She Hates Biden. Her Neighbors Hate
- Statement By Press Secretary Jen Psaki On Eviction Moratorium …
- Kevin Mccarthy Quietly Moves To Tamp Down Fallout After Damaging
Dick’s Case
Dick’s case is the most recent of a number of similar battles that have highlighted the delicate balance that local officials must maintain between safeguarding free speech and responding to concerns over language that some citizens find offensive.
“It’s not a political issue here. “It’s a straightforward question of language,” Bundy argued. “Political communication is not restricted by this regulation.
Ms. Dilascio’s freedom of speech cannot be curtailed or curtailed by the community or its laws. However, the right to free expression is not a universal one. Because of this, we can’t just throw up the First Amendment flag and declare whatever we say is protected speech.
Read Also:
- Jeff Bezos Is Taunting Politicians. Will
- Rivian Stock Falls Again As Production And Sales Woes Bite
- Pence Reached His Limit With Trump. It Wasn’t Pretty.
Last Words
An counsel for the borough stated in court filings that freedom of speech is not an absolute right since “reasonable constraints” may be imposed on some forms of unprotected expression. According to the ordinance, “current community standards” must be applied to determine if the signs are obscene to the typical person.
